Article Today, Visakhapatnam:
A recent promotional event for the film Thug Life held in Chennai has stirred a major controversy after veteran actor Kamal Haasan made a statement about the Kannada language. During his speech, Haasan remarked that the Kannada language had also originated from Tamil. His comment has triggered widespread outrage, especially among Kannada-speaking people, who see it as an insult to their linguistic and cultural pride.
The timing of his statement has added to the controversy, as the relationship between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka has long been sensitive due to ongoing issues like water disputes and border disagreements. In such a delicate atmosphere, public figures making strong or provocative comments is often seen as irresponsible. Analysts suggest that instead of promoting harmony, such remarks can deepen existing tensions and hurt people’s sentiments.
Public Backlash and Refusal to Apologize
As the backlash intensified, Kamal Haasan responded again, stating that his comments were based on what he had learned from various historians and linguistic scholars. He claimed that there was no other intention behind his statement. “Even I don’t have the authority to speak about the origins of language, and the same applies to politicians. What I said came from love and respect. Many experts have taught me about the history of languages,” he explained.
However, despite the rising anger and emotional responses from many in Karnataka, Haasan did not offer a direct apology. While he acknowledged that the topic should be left to experts such as historians, archaeologists, and linguists, he firmly stated that he would not say sorry for what he said. Critics argue that a simple apology would have gone a long way in calming the situation, especially if he had expressed regret for unintentionally hurting people’s feelings.
Rising Regional Tensions
The issue highlights the fragile nature of regional sentiments in India, where language and identity are deeply interwoven. What may seem like a casual comment can quickly escalate into a political and cultural storm. In today’s emotionally charged atmosphere, public figures are expected to be more cautious and thoughtful in their statements. In Kamal Haasan’s case, his refusal to fully acknowledge the emotional impact of his words has only intensified the criticism. As the debate continues, many hope for a more respectful and sensitive approach in discussions surrounding language and heritage.
