Article Today, New Delhi:
The Union government is examining a proposal that would require smartphones to keep advanced location tracking permanently enabled, according to a report by Reuters. The move, if accepted, would mark a significant shift in how user location data is managed in India and has already triggered concerns over privacy and data security.
Industry Push for Precise Tracking
Currently, investigating agencies such as the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate rely on telecom operators for location information based mainly on cell tower signals. This method provides only an approximate position. Therefore, the Cellular Operators Association of India, which represents major players such as Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel, has proposed that smartphone makers be required to keep Assisted GPS permanently switched on. The industry has conveyed this request to the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to enable near real-time location tracking with much higher accuracy.
Implications for Users
If implemented, users may lose the option to disable location tracking on their devices. The proposed system would allow the tracking of a person’s movement with precision of less than one metre. However, this has raised questions about user consent and the limits of state access to personal data.
Opposition from Device Makers
Meanwhile, leading global technology firms, including Apple and Google, through the India Cellular and Electronics Association, have opposed the proposal. They have argued that forcing constant activation of precise location services would weaken privacy protections and turn smartphones into continuous surveillance tools. The association has stated that such a requirement has no precedent in other major digital markets.
Concerns Over Sensitive Categories
In addition, industry groups have warned that continuous location tracking poses serious risks to the safety and privacy of sensitive groups. These include judges, journalists, defence personnel, corporate executives and political leaders. Continuous access to such precise data could expose individuals to targeted surveillance or misuse.
Debate Over Transparency Features
A key point of disagreement is the question of user notification. Device makers argue that users must receive alerts when location access is being used. However, telecom operators have suggested that such alerts could compromise investigations. This sharp divergence has further complicated discussions between the government and industry stakeholders.
Context of Earlier Controversies
The latest proposal comes close on the heels of debates surrounding the Sanchar Saathi platform, which also raised questions about the scope of government access to digital information. Therefore, privacy advocates view the new proposal as part of a broader pattern of expanding digital surveillance.
Next Steps Awaited
However, officials have not yet issued a formal statement on whether the proposal will be accepted in its current form. As consultations continue, legal experts and civil liberties groups are expected to seek greater clarity on safeguards, oversight and accountability before any final decision is taken.
Source: https://reut.rs/3Mg0Dq9
