Article Today, Amravati:
The handling of the IndiGo flight disruption by Union Civil Aviation Minister Kinjirap Ram Mohan Naidu has come under sharp public scrutiny. With thousands of passengers affected across several airports, the absence of an immediate and visible response from the Ministry drew criticism on national television. Republic TV anchor Arnab Goswami questioned the Minister’s silence during prime-time debates, asking why there had been no direct communication or assurance to stranded travellers.
Television Debate Draws Attention
During the live discussion, Mr. Goswami repeatedly sought clarity on the steps taken by the Ministry to contain the crisis. He questioned whether the Minister was actively monitoring the situation while passengers faced prolonged delays and cancellations. The debate quickly gained traction on social media, amplifying the pressure on the Ministry to respond.
TDP’s Defence Sparks Fresh Questions
Meanwhile, Telugu Desam Party representatives attempted to defend the situation during the debates. One party spokesperson stated that Nara Lokesh was personally overseeing developments and that a coordination mechanism had been put in place. However, this line of defence invited further questions, as the crisis pertains to a Union Ministry and a private airline, with no direct administrative role attributed to Mr. Lokesh at the Centre.
Second Round of Confrontation
In a subsequent debate, another TDP representative faced pointed questions from Mr. Goswami regarding the Minister’s availability and accountability. The anchor claimed that attempts to contact the Minister directly had not yielded a response. This exchange further intensified the political spotlight on the Civil Aviation Ministry.
Political and Public Fallout
As the discussions continued over two days, the issue evolved into a broader debate on ministerial accountability during major public service disruptions. The controversy has triggered criticism on digital platforms and placed the TDP leadership under pressure to clarify its position. Public attention now remains focused on the Ministry’s next steps and on whether a formal statement or intervention will follow to address passenger grievances.
